Home › New Nanos National Poll - CP, 32%, LP 30%, NDP ...
New Nanos National Poll - CP, 32%, LP 30%, NDP 20%, GP 10%, BQ 9%
The first post election poll by Nanos Research shows a tightening of the margin between the Conservatives and the Liberals. The initial change may suggest that the Prime Minister’s comments relating to a possible deficit may not necessarily be resonating well among core Conservative supporters in Western Canada. The Dion resignation may have made the Liberals a temporary parking spot for disaffected Conservatives.
The detailed tables with the regional sub-tabs and methodology are posted on our website at: http://www.nanosresearch.com.
Methodology
Polling between November 11 and November 15, 2008. (Random Telephone Survey of 1,000 Canadians, 18 years of age and older). A survey of 1,000 Canadians is accurate to within 3.1 percentage points, plus or minus, 19 times out of 20.
Ballot Question: For those parties you would consider voting for federally, could you please rank your top two current local preferences? (Committed Voters Only - First Choice)
The numbers in parenthesis denote the change from the Federal Election.
Committed Voters - Canada (N=865, MoE ± 3.4%, 19 times out of 20)
- Conservative Party 32% (-6)
- Liberal Party 30% (+4)
- NDP 20% (+2)
- Green Party 10% (+3)
- BQ 9% (-1)
(*Note: Undecided 14%)
Committed Voters - Western Canada (N=299, MoE ± 5.7%, 19 times out of 20)
- Conservative Party 38% (-14)
- Liberal Party 27% (+11)
- NDP 23% (+1)
- Green Party 13% (+5)
(*Note: Undecided 14%)
What do you think?
Cheers, NJN
Remember to rate the views of others - to allow us to recognize the opinion leaders in our national conversation.
Individuals with the top ratings make it to Nik’s Leaderboard
|
Most Read Comments
Highest Rated Comments
Honestly - i think conservative supporters just don't answer telephone polls as ... more
Foxer (British Columbia) 19 Nov 16:51
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081118.weconomy19/BNStory/p... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 19 Nov 17:26
Well well it appears that Canadians are having second thoughts about Harper and ... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 19 Nov 16:46
Here's a report by the Commons guy who was appointed by Harper and has given /fl... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 21 Nov 01:06
Ill informed...there was not one partisan comment in those remarks above. The fa... more
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 21 Nov 09:28
Bernie:---The Opposition is the "government in waiting" and they do not like to ... more
Tom Good (British Columbia) 21 Nov 15:09
Comments
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)
Well well it appears that Canadians are having second thoughts about Harper and his band of incompetent clowns. The very fact that Liberal supporters sat on their hands in the last election was of some comfort to me because they didn't and couldn't vote for Harper or lyin Jack, the greens, etc.
And with the Libs getting a NEW LEADER they should get lots or press while the economy goes down the tubes from Tory mismanagement.
I believe the Libs will try and topple the cons b/f the end of this year.
[updated Wed Nov 19 16:46:50 EST 2008]
19 Nov 16:46
12 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Foxer
Honestly - i think conservative supporters just don't answer telephone polls as much between elections. This is about what we saw from nic's numbers just before the election - where suddenly they jumped up and stayed fairly high thru the election, and now nosedive back to where they've been for a while.
It is interesting to note that almost every pollster missed calling this election badly.
I think that there's going to have to be a serious rethink about how we conduct polls to gain better accuracy. I have seen absolutely zero increase in liberal support around here, nor have i heard of any anywhere else, nor is there really an event that would tend to suggest there should be (other than dion quitting, which admittedly might bump them up a bit. The guy was an albatross around their neck).
Something's changed, and we're just not seeing the kind of accuracy we used to. Perhaps voters are just more volitile, or perhaps more people refuse to take polls.
[updated Wed Nov 19 16:51:07 EST 2008]
19 Nov 16:51
25 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081118.weconomy19/BNStory/politics/home
"OTTAWA — Jim Flaherty may be set to become the first federal finance minister in nearly 40 years to oversee a return to budget deficits,"
IHS Global Insight Canada managing director Dale Orr said Mr. Flaherty and the Conservatives should have taken better precautions against a deficit, noting they cut some rainy-day cushions and drove program spending up 13.8 per cent in their first two years.
It's also hard to find an economist who supports the Conservatives' decision to forgo $11-billion of annual revenue and cut the goods and services tax by two points, instead of using that fiscal room for productivity-enhancing, broad-based income-tax cuts.
That notwithstanding, Mr. Orr said, he believes Mr. Flaherty “is certainly the best person in the Conservative cabinet to be the finance minister.”
"If Ottawa runs a deficit in the 2009-2010 fiscal year, as bank economists have predicted, it will be the first in 13 years. It will also be the first time Ottawa has slid into the red from a surplus since 1970-1971.
That's despite the fact that Mr. Flaherty – a soldier in Mike Harris's Common Sense Revolution – declared several times this year that he wouldn't be the finance minister who oversees the return of deficits."
[updated Wed Nov 19 17:26:02 EST 2008]
19 Nov 17:26
48 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
hollinm
It is far too early to determine what the trend will be in the coming days/weeks.
However, there is one thing I have noted. The government is being much more proactive about promoting and explaining their agenda. That is a good thing, The Libs, NDP and Bloc will have a hard time getting away with their sometimes outrageous comments about what the government is doing when government ministers are front and centre.
It is also clear we as a country are in for a tough ride and the government is signalling that everyday. They are making the right noises and that is good. Keep Canadians in the loop.
Canadians will decide whether they are doing the right things over time and not the opposition parties.
[updated Wed Nov 19 17:58:24 EST 2008]
19 Nov 17:58
3 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Tom Good
It all goes to show that elections are related to the stock market whose prime motivating force is emotion rather than common sense. The volatity of the voter at large is surprising but looking back at recent previous elections it is easy to see those surprising swings when something negative pops up or is deliberately introduced into the election process.
The fact a new Liberal leader is in the offing has to be positive for the Grits. The deficit word is a negative and, seemingly, the electorate expects the Government to have some foolproof crystal ball in these economic times to predict the future begs common sense. One usually has difficulty predicting the future in their own family with stable economic times but governments are supposed to have Extra Sensory Perception ? ? ?Governments are made up of people like you and me with all our flaws but Governments employ a trained Civil Service to give them the best advice possible but even that is not flawless assuming Ministers listen.
Yes, job losses in the manufacturing belt understandably will be a big negative when Government, at this moment, appears to have no plan to implement. This is where the "huge" Unemployment Insurance surplus should be readily available to give some relief. The melt down of the Alberta Heritage Fund must be a real shocker to the core area of Conservative support and a further discussion of a cutback in Alberta's per capita spending must be another shocker for Conservativeland. It would seem to me common sense to cut back provincial spending when the bottom has been knocked out of your revenues.
I believe another consideration has to have come out of the Winnipeg Policy Convention where the far right of the party---the Reform element--- indicated they were alive and well and they "would have their way" if at all possible-----if not now, then in the future. They got the press and, in my opinion, they have somewhat devalued the Conservative persona in the eyes of the electorate at large. I referred to this particular aspect as Harper's threat from within.
One positive is that time heals all and the electorate has a short term memory and usually no long term memory.
[updated Wed Nov 19 18:26:04 EST 2008]
19 Nov 18:26
38 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
westerner
The next election is a long way off. What was the purpose of this poll? Seems rather useless except for a few political junkies to argue over.
[updated Wed Nov 19 18:41:12 EST 2008]
19 Nov 18:41
8 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Warning Warning do not listen to any Liberals or the EDC about exporting to China, Civil unrest is happening and Canadian (BC) companies are not getting paid by Chinese Banks, Do not let a Chinese in Canada scam you about investing or visiting China!!!!!
Stay Away For Your Own Good!!!!!!!
[updated Wed Nov 19 22:24:57 EST 2008]
19 Nov 22:24
1 reply so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Bernie
I was a little surprised with this poll and the direction it's going in. It's immaterial . It has no significance now that the election is over , other than to satisfy the curiosity of some of us (me included). It has no intrinsic value.
Nik's comments on the Mike Duffy show were spot on. So I won't rehash them here.
I cannot help but think that Harper's response to the economy crisis and reaction to the convention in Winnipeg will be eroding his popularity over time.
As Tom so often reminds us governments engineer their own demise.
[updated Thu Nov 20 08:28:01 EST 2008]
20 Nov 08:28
7 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Simeon
Rubbish ! The "Greens" at 10% more like .01%.This poll is worthy of the trash bin.
[updated Thu Nov 20 08:35:01 EST 2008]
20 Nov 08:35
1 reply so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Non-aligned in Toronto
Certainly some of the Liberal rebound will be as a result of the Dion resignation, although I think voters may well find Rae and Ignatieff equally unpalatable. I think the drop in Conservative support is largely Harper's pre-election comments about recession, deficits and the market (bargain hunting anyone? the markets off another 3000 points since then!) coming back on him.
We are pretty much back to where we were a month before the election. A lot will depend, going forward, on how Harper conducts himself and his Party in Parliament over the next few months, and on his first budget.
[updated Thu Nov 20 12:01:20 EST 2008]
20 Nov 12:01
No replies yet. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Martha Hall Findley is acting like a bit of an ass in Parliament right now at 11:41 am pacific do you not think, Habs was this your choice for Leader of the Liberal Party, I think so!
[updated Thu Nov 20 14:42:09 EST 2008]
20 Nov 14:42
No replies yet. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Deflation now tops policy-makers' hit list
Cars are piling up in storage because dealers don't want bloated inventories. Chinese factories are running out of room for all the appliances they're turning out but can't ship. The prices of flat-screen TVs are plummeting; and Americans are so sure housing prices will continue falling that they would rather wait than take the plunge back into real estate.
These are some of the disquieting signs that the once-distant spectre of deflation is looming larger on the horizon, now that economies around the world have fallen into the iron grip of a deep recession.
The latest news has only added to growing fears that the existing global credit mess and feeble economies could be the springboard for a crippling bout of deflation of the sort that derailed the once-thriving Japanese economy for about a decade.
http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081119.wdeflation20/BNStory/Business/?cid=al_gam_nletter_newsUp
[updated Thu Nov 20 18:04:47 EST 2008]
20 Nov 18:04
11 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Chris30
I’m a westerner that voted Con last election and I will not be happy with a deficit. However the odds of the Liberals ever getting my vote is about as likely as them trying to get my vote. I will be watch the Liberal leadership race and listening intently. I’m cynical and I highly highly doubt they’ll even try to resonate out here is Saskatchewan. The Liberal party here is a joke they were under 10% of the vote for the last provincial election they’d be under 10% federally too if it wasn’t for Goodale. Most of the candidates they ran were Green party quality in their knowledge and experience. This would be all fine and great if you’re a hard core Con however some of us would like a realistic choice (no the NDP isn’t one). Here’s to hoping the Liberals try to resonate out here otherwise I’ll just keep stumbling into the voting booth to mark my X by the Con again next time.
Cheers Chris
[updated Fri Nov 21 00:18:53 EST 2008]
21 Nov 00:18
21 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)
Here's a report by the Commons guy who was appointed by Harper and has given /flaherty failing grades.
http://www.thestar.com/business/article/540348
" The report by Kevin Page, the new Parliamentary Budget Officer, concludes that the federal Conservatives are likely to run budget deficits "in the near term," possibly beginning this year, and that the fault lies as much with Flaherty as it does with the weak economy."
Further.........
"Page says the deterioration of the federal government's financial picture in the first nine months of 2008 is not so much the result of the weakened economy as Flaherty's policies, particularly the latest reduction in the GST tax and reduced corporate income taxes. This has caused federal revenues to decline by $353 million in the first nine months of this year.
Assuming no changes in Flaherty's policies, "the downgraded economic outlook suggests the government would record modest and temporary deficits in the near term," Page says."
[updated Fri Nov 21 01:06:05 EST 2008]
21 Nov 01:06
12 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Budget chief's deficit forecast forces Ottawa to face reality
$3.9-billion shortfall estimate leaves Flaherty weighing amount of spending necessary to stave off recession
Why the economic outlook appears gloomy
1. Plunging commodity prices will reduce the government's revenue
by shrinking corporate profits and personal incomes.
2. Exports will slump because of weaker demand from the United States
and other countries, making layoffs at factories likely.
3. The government's decision to cut the Goods
and Services Tax and boost spending has
shrunk the surplus to its smallest in years.
4. Canada's economy is on track to grow at a fraction
of the 1.7-per-cent pace the government expected
in February, and even risks contracting.
5. Consumer and business confidence has deteriorated
=============================================
This article is typical of biased idealogy or fuzzy math.
A solution agreed to by the G20 is a financial stimulus to increase or spur spending by all groups.
Consumer and business confidence has MELTED: orders inventory are not moving. Trust in our financial industry has evaporated as massive bailouts and halving of pensions are being reported daily.
Until the Banks lend: Business and consumers spend again we are heading towards the "recession/depression" model.
The suggestion lowering the GST by 2% is responsible for NOT stimulating consumer spending and only emptying the federal coffers is INACCURATE. We have had modest growth in the last 2 years. 2009 will see much bigger Revenue shortfalls as EXPORTS vanish.
It's not about our national domestic economy, we are dependent on EXPORTING our good and services for our economic health.
I agree with non-essential spending needs to be FROZEN and CUT but the CPC wants to get re-elected and cutting the programs regardless of necessity will be played by the media, premiers, opposition as attacks and "idealogical mean spirited" based decisions.
I don't think spending between $10-26 Billion on "projects" will fix the "problem" in Canada. It is beyond our borders.
Having the CPC/Liberal Party agree on budget cuts in a cooperative fashion would be nice optics but I don't live in Disneyland.
Expect a return to a bitter HOC with Liberal leaders blaming the CPC for not waving the magic wand and not hoarding billions for rainy day. The aggressive Martin downloading to the provinces won't be adopted by the CPC, so look for modest across the board freezes and cuts in spending.
Proof is the opposition platforms to increase ARTS funding of the Federal Government by $100+ million in the election campaign. They have no genuine interest in supporting the tough measures.
Anyone believe anyother "reality" in the HOC going forward?
Harper will try to keep his party from appearing "mean-spirited" but will push his agenda through when the other parties continue to attack and blame idealogy for the global economy and refuse to cooperate.
Increasing taxes is the NDP, Bloc, Liberal idea to pay for their "needed" social programs.
[updated Fri Nov 21 09:00:47 EST 2008]
21 Nov 09:00
2 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Bank meltdown a matter of trust
Andrew Willis, today at 7:52 AM EST
Here's a simple explanation for what's ailing banks in general and Citigroup in particular: There's a lack of trust.
Citi can drop 20-something per cent for two straight days because investors who aren't Saudi billionaires have lost confidence in its management. They don't have faith in executives who blame others for what are clearly self-inflicted problems. As TD Waterhouse pointing out Friday, “ Management is blaming short-sellers, but they also appear to be at fault with some questionable balance-sheet maneuvers that included the unwinding of its SIVs and the reclassification of about $80-billion in assets so that they would not have to be marked to market prices.”
As we saw with Lehman Brothers, this can end badly, and quickly. The Wall Street Journal is reporting Friday that Citi's board of directors is beginning to consider radical strategic moves – a bust up or sale of the bank.
Citi's market capitalization is now much smaller than that Royal Bank of Canada's, and on par with the mid-tier Canadian players. And Cit, remember, is expected to write a $13-billion cheque for its share of the BCE buyout loans by Dec. 11.
The credibility issue looms large at Citi, but hangs over other banks too. When Toronto-Dominion Bank highlights its ability to avoid the credit mess, then takes a $350-million writedown on its $10-billion proprietary credit portfolio, the stage is set for Thursday's one-day, 13-per-cent drop in the stock.
Once lost, trust is devilishly difficult to rebuild. It will be some time before the banks enjoy premium valuations.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/streetwise?cid=al_gam_nletter_maropen
[updated Fri Nov 21 10:33:02 EST 2008]
21 Nov 10:33
4 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
larryl
How many of you out there are as amazed as I am that a month ago Harper was saying how sound and safe our economy was? Now he thinks deficits are essential. Bob Rae did exactly what Harper is about to do . Rae tried to spend his way out of a recession and still gets blamed for the mess Ontario got into. When the economy turns around in 5 or 6 years we will just go back to the same policy that got the world into this fiasco. I am a retired electrician but could see this coming months ago and said so on this site in May. I could have told you sooner but only joined this illustrious group of experts during that month. I have been told by the real experts here that I am ignorant ,ill informed and don't have a clue about anything . Sure am glad I'm not as knowledgeable as some of you think you are. How long before WW3 starts to stimulate the world out of this economic mess? Maybe if we got out of phoney wars we could spend those billions rebuilding our country instead of blowing one up to rebuild it. We would at least create a few jobs at Timmy's for all those soldiers coming home. Can you imagine a franchise on every military base?
[updated Sun Nov 23 10:00:13 EST 2008]
23 Nov 10:00
28 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
Should taxpayers funds be used to keep the Detroit 3 plants open in Canada? If yes what conditions are acceptable?
Should Canada act before OBAMA is in office January 20, 2009?
If yes, what other industries should be allowed to apply for taxpayers funds?
If no, will the current government bear the brunt in the next election, or will the Canadians against any bailout with taxpayers shift support as a result. Opinions?
[updated Sun Nov 23 20:03:08 EST 2008]
23 Nov 20:03
110 replies so far. Join this conversationHide this conversation.
larryl
Uninformed. The Detroit 3 plants are located in Canada and employ Canadians. If we bailout those workers we need to impose conditions on the corporations or just let them go bankrupt and takeover the facilities . We could convert to building military vehicles just like they did during WW2. Harper wants to increase defense spending so he could kill two birds with one stone. I worked in the old American Motors site that built thousands of Jeeps during the war.Maybe we could start building ships like we used to . Of course these steps would only be taken by someone who actually wants to save this country from being swallowed up by the Americans and I don't think Steve is interested in that.
[updated Sun Nov 23 20:37:42 EST 2008]
23 Nov 20:37
Foxer
What the hell do we want with military vehicles? And ships? - how do you turn a land locked auto plant into a shipbuilding facility?
[updated Sun Nov 23 21:14:26 EST 2008]
23 Nov 21:14
larryl
The ship building plants on the east coast are sitting idle. Many of those workers went west to work in Ontario and Alberta . They would love nothing better than to go home and do what they they did for generations. As for the military vehicles you might check casualty lists from Afghanistan. Most of our losses have been in armored vehicles that are not built to withstand IED's. Maybe we could build them better than what we have been buying from God knows who. History should tell you if a depression is bad enough only WW3 will get us out of it. We can plan for what is coming and be prepared when it happens.Of course if the real plan could be to form a North American Union and close all borders to imports from outside our free trade zone.
[updated Sun Nov 23 22:01:54 EST 2008]
23 Nov 22:01
MRM
larryl - The vehicles are built to withstand a blast from an IED with the best technology in the world available. The "God knows who" is General Dynamics land Systems in a plant in London Ontario who also supply the US Army, Marine Corps and a number of EU countries. Why? Because they are the best on the market. As a matter of fact eight of my friends are alive today because the vehicle saved their lives yesterday.
[updated Sun Nov 23 22:26:20 EST 2008]
23 Nov 22:26
larryl
MRM. How many of your friends have been killed or crippled in those vehicles.If they were not there they would not have been in any danger of being blown up. I wonder where the next war will be started by lies or misleading intelligence reports?
[updated Sun Nov 23 23:12:10 EST 2008]
23 Nov 23:12
Again your Liberal Party sent these men and women in outdated equipment. They also voted to extend the mission after 3 flip flops.
The current gov't is spending billions to protect them on their missioin.
[updated Mon Nov 24 11:45:39 EST 2008]
24 Nov 11:45
larryl
Obsessed. The Liberals along with the rest of the world were lied to by the Americans. The phony war on terror should never have started if the U.S. government kept their foreign policy out of other countries. Our armed forces were equipped to protect our country and serve as peace keepers when needed . I colour of your uniform does not matter much if you are wearing a United Nations blue helmut . Better to wear green and be Identified as a peace keeper by those you are supposedly trying to help. Fluorescent orange might even be a better choice so even the Americans would know who we are . Friendly fire might be less of a possibility. You want the opposition to work with the government but when they make concessions to get a firm withdrawel date you still criticize . Make up your mind or get over it.
[updated Mon Nov 24 12:55:44 EST 2008]
24 Nov 12:55
Lex Llewdor
When did the Americans ever lie to anyone about Afghanistan?
[updated Mon Nov 24 13:38:11 EST 2008]
24 Nov 13:38
larryl
Lex. The U.S. invaded under the false pretext that the 911 terrorists were trained in Afghanistan. 15 of the supposed attackers were from Saudi Arabia and funded by them. If anyone should have been invaded it was Saudi Arabia. How does an impoverished nation fund terrorist activities. They don't. Find out where the money was coming from and you will know who was guilty of what.A never ending war on terror is the creation of the war mongers in the U.S.
[updated Mon Nov 24 13:52:37 EST 2008]
24 Nov 13:52
Lex Llewdor
They didn't lie to us. We knew the terrorists were Saudis. We knew Osama bin Laden was a Saudi (we'd known that for years - he's the guy who bombed the WTC in 1993). We also knew that Al Qaeda mostly operated in Afghanistan under the protection of the Taliban there.
Unlike Iraq, there wasn't any other ulterior motive for invading Afghanistan. They don't have any resources we want, and by knocking the Taliban out of power they actually restarted the Opium trade, which the Americans oppose.
Afghanistan was exactly the place to go to stop Al Qaeda's operations.
All that was going on in Saudi Arabia was money transfers. Overwhemling force is not the best way to stop that.
Plus, since Saudi Arabia is home to Islam's two most holy sites, having a non-Islamic power invade there would start a far bigger conflict than anyone wants. Invanding Saudi Arabia would just be irresponsible. And, they also have tons of oil, so they're exactly the sort of place the Americans supposedly like invanding.
Afghanistan was a perfectly legitimate mission, and NATO voted unanimously not to oppose US military action there. Do you think Turkey just took the Americans on faith? Of course not. The Americans shared their intelligence with their NATO allies.
Really, if it had been France that was attacked, I'm sure we would have seen a rash of assassinations all across the Arab world (the French are really good at covert ops).
[updated Mon Nov 24 18:50:41 EST 2008]
24 Nov 18:50
larryl
Lex. The ulterior motive you seem to have missed is the fact they started a never ending war on terrorism in a desolate country that produced much of the worlds opium . The C.I.A. or Cocaine In America was not getting any of their black ops funding without the opium trade and had to restore the poppy fields to pre Taliban levels. No one knows how much the C.I.A. spends around the world disrupting foreign governments and setting up puppet dictators but I can guarantee they spend a lot more than what government records reveal.If you don't get enough funding from your government then you find other means of earning the millions you need to do what you do.
[updated Mon Nov 24 19:38:26 EST 2008]
24 Nov 19:38
If Harper does not cooperate with the opposition than he should have your disdain. Short of that going forward he has asked for a new decorum, and a new spirit in cooperation. That does not mean abandoning the CPC platform and adopting the NDP policies. What it means is to work on issues they agree on and work on a compromise to get bills passed. It's not about idealogy, it about moving the business forward to tackle the storm coming.
The public is watching every member in the HOC, including the opposition simply criticize and look backward and provide "hindsight". It's not going to work, in fact it will demostrate the "sore" losers and not turning a page.
[updated Mon Nov 24 16:42:18 EST 2008]
24 Nov 16:42
larryl
Uninformed. Harper could have done what you see he needs to do now before we spent $300 million. He should have adjusted his goals and policies rather than force a stupid pointless election. Now that the country is in difficulty he is asking for the opposition's cooperation but 3 months ago he was determined to bring in his agenda and wanted them to give him a free hand. He claimed the government was at an impasse but would not work with the minority he had.He didn't need to go so far as to follow the NDP. All he needed was to adopt good ideas from where ever they came from .including money saving ideas from Iggy. I think it might be a little late to be making peace offerings. He wanted power and he has it.
[updated Mon Nov 24 17:21:38 EST 2008]
24 Nov 17:21
You fail to understand how the HOC works, the opposition Hi-jacked parliament and committees. They passed Kyoto legislation when the liberals got uppity. FACT
Harper gave them an opportunity to work in the fall on his agenda, and everyone went before the press and said NO. So again you keep distorting the reality of what happened. He pulled the plug and gave voters an opportunity to pass judgement. They did, he is back in a larger capacity. Did you miss the beating the Liberals got?
Dion admitted the last 6 months was dysfunctional, did you miss that too? It's again about being honest, which you choose not to be.
Again the ideas from the Liberals on saving 12 Billion don't exist. You honestly thing the Liberals care about Canada?
Harper called his bluff, don't you get it? The opposition are simply outclassed and outmatched. They have nothing to offer Canadians but be critical. Like yourself, nothing but disdain without proof against Harper or his attempts to keep Canada movng forward.
You view things as half-empty, I choose half-full makes for a happier life.
Goodluck with blaming Harper,Harris for their "conservative label" for being uncaring and letting Canada "suffer" because the Liberal "braintrust" are not in power. That has not been replayed before.
Voters are watching and trust me it will not work out well for Iggy.
Canada has so far been "hit" with the least damage, and other countries are adopting our strategies. FACT
The opposition are shooting blanks and trying to pin the Global Recession on Harper.
The G20 are supporting Harper's ideas and are moving in his direction, China and the US will dump billions to boost their economy.
Can you imagine what country is positioned to benefit from the G20 namely China and the US from stimulus spending?=======> CANADA
We will lose our American Branch Plants auto manufacturing jobs, it is producing cars the CONSUMER are not buying. Sorry you cant force them to buy domestic. This is not China, and they allow you to buy import btw.
The credit crunch exposed the Detroit 3 for ineffective management. They will restructure or fail over the next 10 years and be a much smaller part of our economy. Welcome to the global free trade.
Thank goodness Harper is at the helm and making tough decisions and leading the world in sound policy decisions.
[updated Mon Nov 24 18:35:19 EST 2008]
24 Nov 18:35
larryl
Uninformed . You are not only uninformed you have been mesmerized by Pinnochio and his propaganda machine in Ottawa. The reason the H of C was dysfunctional was because Harper would not give up his agenda and work as a minority government should Concessions should have been made