New Nanos National Poll - CP, 32%, LP 30%, NDP 20%, GP 10%, BQ 9%

943 comments Latest by Lex Llewdor

The first post election poll by Nanos Research shows a tightening of the margin between the Conservatives and the Liberals. The initial change may suggest that the Prime Minister’s comments relating to a possible deficit may not necessarily be resonating well among core Conservative supporters in Western Canada. The Dion resignation may have made the Liberals a temporary parking spot for disaffected Conservatives.

The detailed tables with the regional sub-tabs and methodology are posted on our website at: http://www.nanosresearch.com.

Methodology

Polling between November 11 and November 15, 2008. (Random Telephone Survey of 1,000 Canadians, 18 years of age and older). A survey of 1,000 Canadians is accurate to within 3.1 percentage points, plus or minus, 19 times out of 20.

Ballot Question: For those parties you would consider voting for federally, could you please rank your top two current local preferences? (Committed Voters Only - First Choice)

The numbers in parenthesis denote the change from the Federal Election.

Committed Voters - Canada (N=865, MoE ± 3.4%, 19 times out of 20)

  • Conservative Party 32% (-6)
  • Liberal Party 30% (+4)
  • NDP 20% (+2)
  • Green Party 10% (+3)
  • BQ 9% (-1)

(*Note: Undecided 14%)

Committed Voters - Western Canada (N=299, MoE ± 5.7%, 19 times out of 20)

  • Conservative Party 38% (-14)
  • Liberal Party 27% (+11)
  • NDP 23% (+1)
  • Green Party 13% (+5)

(*Note: Undecided 14%)

What do you think?

Cheers, NJN

Remember to rate the views of others - to allow us to recognize the opinion leaders in our national conversation.

Individuals with the top ratings make it to Nik’s Leaderboard

Reply to Topic

Most Read Comments

Highest Rated Comments

Honestly - i think conservative supporters just don't answer telephone polls as ... more

Foxer (British Columbia) 19 Nov 16:51

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081118.weconomy19/BNStory/p... more

gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 19 Nov 17:26

Well well it appears that Canadians are having second thoughts about Harper and ... more

gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 19 Nov 16:46

Here's a report by the Commons guy who was appointed by Harper and has given /fl... more

gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 21 Nov 01:06

Ill informed...there was not one partisan comment in those remarks above. The fa... more

gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post) (Ontario) 21 Nov 09:28

Bernie:---The Opposition is the "government in waiting" and they do not like to ... more

Tom Good (British Columbia) 21 Nov 15:09

Comments

gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)

Well well it appears that Canadians are having second thoughts about Harper and his band of incompetent clowns. The very fact that Liberal supporters sat on their hands in the last election was of some comfort to me because they didn't and couldn't vote for Harper or lyin Jack, the greens, etc.

And with the Libs getting a NEW LEADER they should get lots or press while the economy goes down the tubes from Tory mismanagement.

I believe the Libs will try and topple the cons b/f the end of this year.


[updated Wed Nov 19 16:46:50 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

19 Nov 16:46

12 replies so far. Join this conversation.

Foxer

Honestly - i think conservative supporters just don't answer telephone polls as much between elections. This is about what we saw from nic's numbers just before the election - where suddenly they jumped up and stayed fairly high thru the election, and now nosedive back to where they've been for a while.

It is interesting to note that almost every pollster missed calling this election badly.

I think that there's going to have to be a serious rethink about how we conduct polls to gain better accuracy. I have seen absolutely zero increase in liberal support around here, nor have i heard of any anywhere else, nor is there really an event that would tend to suggest there should be (other than dion quitting, which admittedly might bump them up a bit. The guy was an albatross around their neck).

Something's changed, and we're just not seeing the kind of accuracy we used to. Perhaps voters are just more volitile, or perhaps more people refuse to take polls.

[updated Wed Nov 19 16:51:07 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

19 Nov 16:51

25 replies so far. Join this conversation.

gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081118.weconomy19/BNStory/politics/home

"OTTAWA — Jim Flaherty may be set to become the first federal finance minister in nearly 40 years to oversee a return to budget deficits,"

IHS Global Insight Canada managing director Dale Orr said Mr. Flaherty and the Conservatives should have taken better precautions against a deficit, noting they cut some rainy-day cushions and drove program spending up 13.8 per cent in their first two years.

It's also hard to find an economist who supports the Conservatives' decision to forgo $11-billion of annual revenue and cut the goods and services tax by two points, instead of using that fiscal room for productivity-enhancing, broad-based income-tax cuts.

That notwithstanding, Mr. Orr said, he believes Mr. Flaherty “is certainly the best person in the Conservative cabinet to be the finance minister.”

"If Ottawa runs a deficit in the 2009-2010 fiscal year, as bank economists have predicted, it will be the first in 13 years. It will also be the first time Ottawa has slid into the red from a surplus since 1970-1971.

That's despite the fact that Mr. Flaherty – a soldier in Mike Harris's Common Sense Revolution – declared several times this year that he wouldn't be the finance minister who oversees the return of deficits."

[updated Wed Nov 19 17:26:02 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

19 Nov 17:26

48 replies so far. Join this conversation.

hollinm

It is far too early to determine what the trend will be in the coming days/weeks.

However, there is one thing I have noted. The government is being much more proactive about promoting and explaining their agenda. That is a good thing, The Libs, NDP and Bloc will have a hard time getting away with their sometimes outrageous comments about what the government is doing when government ministers are front and centre.

It is also clear we as a country are in for a tough ride and the government is signalling that everyday. They are making the right noises and that is good. Keep Canadians in the loop.

Canadians will decide whether they are doing the right things over time and not the opposition parties.

[updated Wed Nov 19 17:58:24 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

19 Nov 17:58

3 replies so far. Join this conversation.

Tom Good

It all goes to show that elections are related to the stock market whose prime motivating force is emotion rather than common sense. The volatity of the voter at large is surprising but looking back at recent previous elections it is easy to see those surprising swings when something negative pops up or is deliberately introduced into the election process.

The fact a new Liberal leader is in the offing has to be positive for the Grits. The deficit word is a negative and, seemingly, the electorate expects the Government to have some foolproof crystal ball in these economic times to predict the future begs common sense. One usually has difficulty predicting the future in their own family with stable economic times but governments are supposed to have Extra Sensory Perception ? ? ?Governments are made up of people like you and me with all our flaws but Governments employ a trained Civil Service to give them the best advice possible but even that is not flawless assuming Ministers listen.

Yes, job losses in the manufacturing belt understandably will be a big negative when Government, at this moment, appears to have no plan to implement. This is where the "huge" Unemployment Insurance surplus should be readily available to give some relief. The melt down of the Alberta Heritage Fund must be a real shocker to the core area of Conservative support and a further discussion of a cutback in Alberta's per capita spending must be another shocker for Conservativeland. It would seem to me common sense to cut back provincial spending when the bottom has been knocked out of your revenues.

I believe another consideration has to have come out of the Winnipeg Policy Convention where the far right of the party---the Reform element--- indicated they were alive and well and they "would have their way" if at all possible-----if not now, then in the future. They got the press and, in my opinion, they have somewhat devalued the Conservative persona in the eyes of the electorate at large. I referred to this particular aspect as Harper's threat from within.

One positive is that time heals all and the electorate has a short term memory and usually no long term memory.

[updated Wed Nov 19 18:26:04 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

19 Nov 18:26

38 replies so far. Join this conversation.

westerner

The next election is a long way off. What was the purpose of this poll? Seems rather useless except for a few political junkies to argue over.

[updated Wed Nov 19 18:41:12 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

19 Nov 18:41

8 replies so far. Join this conversation.

200px-flag_of_canada_svg_thumb Made In Canada Only

Warning Warning do not listen to any Liberals or the EDC about exporting to China, Civil unrest is happening and Canadian (BC) companies are not getting paid by Chinese Banks, Do not let a Chinese in Canada scam you about investing or visiting China!!!!!
Stay Away For Your Own Good!!!!!!!

[updated Wed Nov 19 22:24:57 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

19 Nov 22:24

1 reply so far. Join this conversation.

Bernie

I was a little surprised with this poll and the direction it's going in. It's immaterial . It has no significance now that the election is over , other than to satisfy the curiosity of some of us (me included). It has no intrinsic value.

Nik's comments on the Mike Duffy show were spot on. So I won't rehash them here.
I cannot help but think that Harper's response to the economy crisis and reaction to the convention in Winnipeg will be eroding his popularity over time.

As Tom so often reminds us governments engineer their own demise.

[updated Thu Nov 20 08:28:01 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

20 Nov 08:28

7 replies so far. Join this conversation.

Simeon

Rubbish ! The "Greens" at 10% more like .01%.This poll is worthy of the trash bin.

[updated Thu Nov 20 08:35:01 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

20 Nov 08:35

1 reply so far. Join this conversation.

Non-aligned in Toronto

Certainly some of the Liberal rebound will be as a result of the Dion resignation, although I think voters may well find Rae and Ignatieff equally unpalatable. I think the drop in Conservative support is largely Harper's pre-election comments about recession, deficits and the market (bargain hunting anyone? the markets off another 3000 points since then!) coming back on him.

We are pretty much back to where we were a month before the election. A lot will depend, going forward, on how Harper conducts himself and his Party in Parliament over the next few months, and on his first budget.

[updated Thu Nov 20 12:01:20 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

20 Nov 12:01

No replies yet. Join this conversation.

200px-flag_of_canada_svg_thumb Made In Canada Only

Martha Hall Findley is acting like a bit of an ass in Parliament right now at 11:41 am pacific do you not think, Habs was this your choice for Leader of the Liberal Party, I think so!

[updated Thu Nov 20 14:42:09 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

20 Nov 14:42

No replies yet. Join this conversation.

Rod_thumb Informed1

Deflation now tops policy-makers' hit list

Cars are piling up in storage because dealers don't want bloated inventories. Chinese factories are running out of room for all the appliances they're turning out but can't ship. The prices of flat-screen TVs are plummeting; and Americans are so sure housing prices will continue falling that they would rather wait than take the plunge back into real estate.

These are some of the disquieting signs that the once-distant spectre of deflation is looming larger on the horizon, now that economies around the world have fallen into the iron grip of a deep recession.

The latest news has only added to growing fears that the existing global credit mess and feeble economies could be the springboard for a crippling bout of deflation of the sort that derailed the once-thriving Japanese economy for about a decade.

http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081119.wdeflation20/BNStory/Business/?cid=al_gam_nletter_newsUp

[updated Thu Nov 20 18:04:47 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

20 Nov 18:04

11 replies so far. Join this conversation.

Chris30

I’m a westerner that voted Con last election and I will not be happy with a deficit. However the odds of the Liberals ever getting my vote is about as likely as them trying to get my vote. I will be watch the Liberal leadership race and listening intently. I’m cynical and I highly highly doubt they’ll even try to resonate out here is Saskatchewan. The Liberal party here is a joke they were under 10% of the vote for the last provincial election they’d be under 10% federally too if it wasn’t for Goodale. Most of the candidates they ran were Green party quality in their knowledge and experience. This would be all fine and great if you’re a hard core Con however some of us would like a realistic choice (no the NDP isn’t one). Here’s to hoping the Liberals try to resonate out here otherwise I’ll just keep stumbling into the voting booth to mark my X by the Con again next time.
Cheers Chris

[updated Fri Nov 21 00:18:53 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

21 Nov 00:18

21 replies so far. Join this conversation.

gohabs1 (Suspended for inappropriate post)

Here's a report by the Commons guy who was appointed by Harper and has given /flaherty failing grades.
http://www.thestar.com/business/article/540348

" The report by Kevin Page, the new Parliamentary Budget Officer, concludes that the federal Conservatives are likely to run budget deficits "in the near term," possibly beginning this year, and that the fault lies as much with Flaherty as it does with the weak economy."

Further.........

"Page says the deterioration of the federal government's financial picture in the first nine months of 2008 is not so much the result of the weakened economy as Flaherty's policies, particularly the latest reduction in the GST tax and reduced corporate income taxes. This has caused federal revenues to decline by $353 million in the first nine months of this year.
Assuming no changes in Flaherty's policies, "the downgraded economic outlook suggests the government would record modest and temporary deficits in the near term," Page says."

[updated Fri Nov 21 01:06:05 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

21 Nov 01:06

12 replies so far. Join this conversation.

Rod_thumb Informed1

Budget chief's deficit forecast forces Ottawa to face reality
$3.9-billion shortfall estimate leaves Flaherty weighing amount of spending necessary to stave off recession

Why the economic outlook appears gloomy

1. Plunging commodity prices will reduce the government's revenue

by shrinking corporate profits and personal incomes.

2. Exports will slump because of weaker demand from the United States

and other countries, making layoffs at factories likely.

3. The government's decision to cut the Goods

and Services Tax and boost spending has

shrunk the surplus to its smallest in years.

4. Canada's economy is on track to grow at a fraction

of the 1.7-per-cent pace the government expected

in February, and even risks contracting.

5. Consumer and business confidence has deteriorated
=============================================

This article is typical of biased idealogy or fuzzy math.

A solution agreed to by the G20 is a financial stimulus to increase or spur spending by all groups.

Consumer and business confidence has MELTED: orders inventory are not moving. Trust in our financial industry has evaporated as massive bailouts and halving of pensions are being reported daily.

Until the Banks lend: Business and consumers spend again we are heading towards the "recession/depression" model.

The suggestion lowering the GST by 2% is responsible for NOT stimulating consumer spending and only emptying the federal coffers is INACCURATE. We have had modest growth in the last 2 years. 2009 will see much bigger Revenue shortfalls as EXPORTS vanish.

It's not about our national domestic economy, we are dependent on EXPORTING our good and services for our economic health.

I agree with non-essential spending needs to be FROZEN and CUT but the CPC wants to get re-elected and cutting the programs regardless of necessity will be played by the media, premiers, opposition as attacks and "idealogical mean spirited" based decisions.

I don't think spending between $10-26 Billion on "projects" will fix the "problem" in Canada. It is beyond our borders.

Having the CPC/Liberal Party agree on budget cuts in a cooperative fashion would be nice optics but I don't live in Disneyland.

Expect a return to a bitter HOC with Liberal leaders blaming the CPC for not waving the magic wand and not hoarding billions for rainy day. The aggressive Martin downloading to the provinces won't be adopted by the CPC, so look for modest across the board freezes and cuts in spending.

Proof is the opposition platforms to increase ARTS funding of the Federal Government by $100+ million in the election campaign. They have no genuine interest in supporting the tough measures.

Anyone believe anyother "reality" in the HOC going forward?

Harper will try to keep his party from appearing "mean-spirited" but will push his agenda through when the other parties continue to attack and blame idealogy for the global economy and refuse to cooperate.

Increasing taxes is the NDP, Bloc, Liberal idea to pay for their "needed" social programs.

[updated Fri Nov 21 09:00:47 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

21 Nov 09:00

2 replies so far. Join this conversation.

Rod_thumb Informed1

Bank meltdown a matter of trust
Andrew Willis, today at 7:52 AM EST

Here's a simple explanation for what's ailing banks in general and Citigroup in particular: There's a lack of trust.

Citi can drop 20-something per cent for two straight days because investors who aren't Saudi billionaires have lost confidence in its management. They don't have faith in executives who blame others for what are clearly self-inflicted problems. As TD Waterhouse pointing out Friday, “ Management is blaming short-sellers, but they also appear to be at fault with some questionable balance-sheet maneuvers that included the unwinding of its SIVs and the reclassification of about $80-billion in assets so that they would not have to be marked to market prices.”

As we saw with Lehman Brothers, this can end badly, and quickly. The Wall Street Journal is reporting Friday that Citi's board of directors is beginning to consider radical strategic moves – a bust up or sale of the bank.

Citi's market capitalization is now much smaller than that Royal Bank of Canada's, and on par with the mid-tier Canadian players. And Cit, remember, is expected to write a $13-billion cheque for its share of the BCE buyout loans by Dec. 11.

The credibility issue looms large at Citi, but hangs over other banks too. When Toronto-Dominion Bank highlights its ability to avoid the credit mess, then takes a $350-million writedown on its $10-billion proprietary credit portfolio, the stage is set for Thursday's one-day, 13-per-cent drop in the stock.

Once lost, trust is devilishly difficult to rebuild. It will be some time before the banks enjoy premium valuations.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/streetwise?cid=al_gam_nletter_maropen

[updated Fri Nov 21 10:33:02 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

21 Nov 10:33

4 replies so far. Join this conversation.

larryl

How many of you out there are as amazed as I am that a month ago Harper was saying how sound and safe our economy was? Now he thinks deficits are essential. Bob Rae did exactly what Harper is about to do . Rae tried to spend his way out of a recession and still gets blamed for the mess Ontario got into. When the economy turns around in 5 or 6 years we will just go back to the same policy that got the world into this fiasco. I am a retired electrician but could see this coming months ago and said so on this site in May. I could have told you sooner but only joined this illustrious group of experts during that month. I have been told by the real experts here that I am ignorant ,ill informed and don't have a clue about anything . Sure am glad I'm not as knowledgeable as some of you think you are. How long before WW3 starts to stimulate the world out of this economic mess? Maybe if we got out of phoney wars we could spend those billions rebuilding our country instead of blowing one up to rebuild it. We would at least create a few jobs at Timmy's for all those soldiers coming home. Can you imagine a franchise on every military base?

[updated Sun Nov 23 10:00:13 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 10:00

28 replies so far. Join this conversation.

Rod_thumb Informed1

ROFL, the experts have different opinions, recession short-long, depression so NOT everyone is predicting DOOM and GLOOM.

All the candidates said no to running DEFICITS. You can as a partisan Liberal focus only on Harper as usual.

Did any Government predict a Global Credit Crisis? Did any Government Predict Detroit 3 bankruptcy? Failed Iceland? Give your head a shake. This is a correction, how big is anyone guess.

Lack of regulation, failure on government to act as a watchdog nationally, GLOBALLY are partly to blame. Take a look at Europe and the billions dumped to keep their banks afloat. We did not 'nationalize' any bank and to date no bank is failing.

Consumers borrowing beyond their means, speculators using borrowed money, banks, insurance employees turning a blind eye, SEC, EVERYONE is responsible for gouging and living past their means.

We still have a different predictions TODAY if this if going to be a short,shallow recession or a DEPRESSION.

You can thank Rae for forgiving the automakers billions in funding their pensions leaving taxpayers on the hook.

Last time I checked his fellow Union friends from the CUPE, Auto-Teachers Union withrew support because he would not write a blank check unlike McGuinty who is comfortable to do so.

They did not want Rae Days and helped elect Harris. Harper is not suggesting to write a blank cheque to private or public unions for labour peace.

Do you want Harper to follow Chretien/Martin example and hold money in Ottawa? Too bad he wont act like a RIGHT WING Conservative Idealogue because you need him too.

He will continue to support those in need, just not blank cheques.

[updated Sun Nov 23 14:40:22 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 14:40

Lex Llewdor

You're buying the left-wing propoganga, Informed.

This wasn't lack of regulation. This was over-regulation. This never would have happened if US banks had been free to lend money as they saw fit. But instead, they weren't allowed to refuse loans to poor people - especially poor black people in neighbourhoods with low property values.

Left alone, no banker would have made these NINJA loans (No Income, No Job, No Assets).

[updated Mon Nov 24 13:32:25 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

24 Nov 13:32

Rod_thumb Informed1

I choose to lay blame on everyone who ran the 'ponzi' scheme on taxpayers. Government pass regulations reducing regulations and oversight. I want government to provide those safety measure and I am willing to have slower growth as a result.

Everyone turned a blind eye to the Greenspan "low credit theory" that Banks would act in a reasonable manner and protect their books. They along with politicians of both parties, sub prime mortagage holders, lived a lifestyle they could not pay. The insurance regulators, appraisers were all benefitting from the "orgy" of increasing growth at whatever cost. How many homeowners refinanced to have more money because credit was so low? Now they have no equity, massive loans against lines of credit, card card debt, sub prime mortgages. The US is a huge mess and will get alot worse next year if the Detroit 3 are allowed to fail.

It's not about idealogy. It's about living within your means without artificial subsidies and barriers being put up between countries and provinces.

[updated Mon Nov 24 16:34:03 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

24 Nov 16:34

Lex Llewdor

I think the bankers were acting reasonably. Given the choice between making a ton of money lending out the federal reserve's resources, or not doing that because it was a bad investment, they chose to offer the loans.

This is government tampering laid bare. Bankers DO act responsibly left to their own devices because they want to turn a big profit. But they weren't left to their own devices.

We need less government intervention, not more.

[updated Mon Nov 24 18:43:53 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

24 Nov 18:43

Rod_thumb Informed1

I am not confident in the Board protecting shareholders. Unfortunately in too many cases Boards act as stooges for the management.

We do need better oversight and legislation with teeth for boards, management acting improperly.

[updated Mon Nov 24 19:41:12 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

24 Nov 19:41

Foxer

Well - you're not quite being accurate there larryl. He didn't say deficits are essential. He said that deficits will be required IF - note the word if - we are going to participate in an economic stimulation package designed to keep the economy from collapsing and to position ourselves for the expected recovery. And his argument is that is 'essential' for speeding the recovery of the economy, and he feels its necessary on a global scale.

Remember who he was talking to when he made those comments.

Now - that is not the same as what Rae did. Rae didn't try to do at all. Rae tried to end the recession by 'spending his way out of it'. In other words, he wanted to create a false economy under the belief that if he did so long enough it would become a 'real' economy. The 'fake it till you make it' theory. That did NOT work.

Harper suggests something quite different. His attitude is that we need to prevent the collapse of some businesses and industry, minimize the impact of the down turn and make sure that provinces don't have to slash to the bone to survive. That and some targeted infrastructure spending to improve our competitiveness will leave us stronger to take advantage of opportunity when the economy does rebound.

His answer to dealing with the economy isn't to 'spend his way out of it'. His answer is to create opportunity that didn't exist before to allow businesses to shift focus and find new sources of customers and revenue.

And as a result, the economy won't take 5 or 6 years to turn around. They're now saying 18 months and that's about what i predicted a few posts ago - mid 2010 recovery.

As to being told you're 'uninformed' by 'experts' because you said we were going to have problems back in may - well I can think of one expert who was agreeing with you at the time: Harper. He said last january we were going to have some very rocky economic times ahead. The opposition accused him of fear mongering but turns out he was right.

And it's not going to take ww3 to get us out of this mess :)

The fact is this was anticipated by harper, our economy and financal systems have long since been tightened to deal with this, our economy is able to weather it due to low taxation and the availability of cash to borrow, and we're going to be thru it in just over a year.

So get a grip - and please, DO try to understand what the gov't is saying.

[updated Sun Nov 23 15:46:03 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 15:46

Rod_thumb Informed1

He just can't help but attack Harper regardless of what Harper actually does, the fact he is asking for support and cooperation from all parties is unimportant.

He has publicly asked the Liberals for the 12 Billion in savings they identified from their campaign, and Iggy's response is to tell the gov't this is "your" mess. you fix it. Sure makes for an interesting AD later when he runs for PM. I will only give ideas when I am in power and until than Canada can sink under the CPC.

It will be sad if the Liberals don't take this olive branch keep blaming the global slowdown on Harper and use the new budget officer as their poster boy. It will come back to haunt them afterwards when he reports those cuts and spending are now working in 12-24 months. Missed opportunity to show a responsible side to the Liberals.

[updated Sun Nov 23 17:45:13 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 17:45

larryl

Uninformed . Why would an economist ask a Harvard professor for advice on how to save money. The electorate will get the government it deserves until the spring when we will go to the polls again. I can tell harper how to save billions. Bring home our troops and spend that money to boost our economy. Of course the 490 billion military spending over the next 20 years is much more important to Harper and can't be postponed can it?

[updated Sun Nov 23 20:18:57 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 20:18

Foxer

Because the liberals 'claimed' they knew how to save 12 billion from the budget without cutting services. Harper just said 'hey, if you really do now's the time to point it out' :)

Of course they were lying. They're liberals. There were no such savings. Harper was just pointing that out. Thank god and common sense that bunch of lunatics didn't win the election.

[updated Sun Nov 23 21:12:31 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 21:12

larryl

If you want to check the phrase I used was " on the verge of global economic collapse". Maybe I should have become an economist like Steve . Maybe he is really a "Big a mist" or a really dense fog.I think if you ask Rae he was simply trying to shorten and lessen the severity of the recession. I didn't make up the word essential. If you read the article in the Star they quote him saying that. You can spin this whatever way you want but it is essentially the same as what the recession did to Rae . Maybe the Liberals were right to lose this election . They can start that old refrain again . Tory times are tough times. Rae will bring out his old campaign tune.I think it went to the same melody as Stormy Weather but he simply substituted Tory. I have to ask if Harper knew this was coming why did cut revenue by billions with corporate tax cuts and a reducing the GST. That sure would help stave off a deficit during tough times.

[updated Sun Nov 23 20:10:45 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 20:10

Foxer

I think you were lucky enough not to blow yourself up as an electrician, high finance might be best left to others :)

Actually - Rae just the other day said he wasn't trying to 'shorten' the recession, he though it would not last as long as it did, and didn't think it would be as deep. He spent believing that the slowdown was short term and he just had to 'prop it up' for a short time. Bad call. It's entirely different than what harper is proposing.

And while you didn't make up the word 'essential', you did misuse it. The economic stimulus package is 'essential', and it will require a deficit.

It isn't even remotely close to what rae did - and if you actually paid attention you'd realize the difference. That's why he's got the support of the other parties (except for a few who don't think he's going far enough).

He cut the tax and gst because that's one of the best ways to stimulate the economy and help recession proof it. Recessions happen when people stop spending money. Lower taxes and lower gst means that people have more money to spend. And in fact, the independent report on our economy cited increased consumer spending as one of the main reasons we've avoided recession so far.

So - score one for harper.

We can stave off a deficit if we want. It's not that hard. But to do so, we would have to cut back AND forget any proping up of industries at all. That would lengthen the recession.

Harper has said what he intends to do is to cut back to make sure that there's no structural deficit - while borrowing what is necessary for an economic package.

By keeping us out of deficit on regular spending harper will prevent what happened to rae. Only the money necessary for short term economic stimulus will be borrowed. Once that is done we go back to balanced budgets. Rae refused to make the cuts necessary to avoid that and allowed structural deficits which it took harris to curtail.

Taxing people more during hard times is NOT 'helping' in a recession. It just lengthens it.

[updated Sun Nov 23 21:07:26 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 21:07

larryl

Since I started helping my father almost 50 years ago and working on everything from 12 to 269,000 volts luck had very little to do with not blowing myself up. I did come close a few times tho. Your claim that cutting taxes is a great way to stave off the recession is just partisan spin. It obviously didn't work since we are headed for or as I said months ago we are in a recession but we just don't know it. Rising oil prices made it look we we were still growing but we were bleeding jobs at an alarming rate. Now that prices are dropping drastically we see the reality of our failing economy.Wait till word gets out that our banks are not as sound as they have been made out to be. How much of their assets only exist on paper or in cyberspace. I have two lines of credit for over 40,000 that show up as bank assets on their books but have absolutely no intention of ever using . Creative book keeping has done wonders for our banking systems . Our own version of sub prime mortgage fiasco might be just a few keystrokes away. You failed to answer the question of why he cut revenues when he knew tough times were coming.

[updated Sun Nov 23 21:31:59 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 21:31

Rod_thumb Informed1

Rofl the fact you think the lines of credit you have are "assets" of the bank reinforces another point of complete ignorance on your part.

Like royalties for AB, you don't know what you are talking about and than try to spin the Liberal Star to suggest you have a clue about economics.

Lowering taxes and costs for business is responsible for growth. You simply cant fathom how a small, medium, business works or you would stop arguing against tax cuts. The FACT Liberals support tax cuts does not convince you, only the NDP are calling for a tax increase for business.

The fact the global recession, credit crunch is growing in size and scope and several ECONOMISTS are predicting different outcomes is simply beyond you limited capacity.

Did Harper predict the Detroit 3 failing? Give your head a shake. Please blame everything on Harper and rehash the election issues again, don't work with the new HOC, follow Iggy's example. It will make for a great TV AD. When the chips are down and Canada needs unity, some stood up , others took their ball and bat and hid behind a curtain. ROFL

The best thing is to follow the NDP and Bloc and vote against the government if you think Canadians will blame Harper.

I guess you never cared about Canada and good government, just about power for your party after all. Shame on you.

[updated Sun Nov 23 22:50:03 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

23 Nov 22:50

Foxer

Quite true informed. I see you've hit on most of the stuff i did :) I should have just replied to your post.

[updated Mon Nov 24 12:34:37 EST 2008]

Reply to Comment

24 Nov 12:34